Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Gun Control Reform Activism
In reply to the discussion: Registration of all handguns. [View all]AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)5. I don't disagree the response is irrational.
I disagree that the characterization of the number of people being "small". It is not. It's a sizeable percentage of gun owners, which are a sizeable percentage of the US population.
I am in a TINY minority of gun owners that support registration in any form. The only time the percentage of people who disapprove of registration looks 'small' in any measure, is up against the total population of the US.
There's a protective shell of irrationality there that must be pierced. First step is coming to grips with who the target audience is.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
53 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I disagree with your characterization of '1%' or 'loonies' being paranoid about this issue.
AtheistCrusader
Mar 2013
#3
One thing to keep in mind is that gun owners fear paying expensive fees each year with registration
NutmegYankee
Mar 2013
#13
So? Get rid of them. If you have a dog, you have to purchase a liscence for EACH ONE
graham4anything
Mar 2013
#14
So? So what. The entire issue needs to be reframed. And a new SCOTUS to reinterpret.
graham4anything
Mar 2013
#16
I bought a new car two weeks ago and - guess what! - the state is now requiring me to register and
apocalypsehow
Mar 2013
#19
No, it's not a false analogy. I purchased an item the state has determined needs to be kept track of
apocalypsehow
Mar 2013
#21
okay - so you agree that it's not the norm and that for the most part people don't do this?
ellisonz
Mar 2013
#25
Yes, you did move the goalposts and followed the so-moving up with more meaningless jazz:
apocalypsehow
Mar 2013
#31
Except, it's not a "thought": it's been proven. The reason you chose not to reply to #31
apocalypsehow
Mar 2013
#36
By-the-bye, for those keeping count: "But I will finish with this response," Nutmeg Yankee, #32.
apocalypsehow
Mar 2013
#40
He saw the best bet in this lop-sided "debate" he was losing was to self-delete and Run! Run! Run!
apocalypsehow
Mar 2013
#43
No, it's not. This is 2013, not 1913. Post links, please, proving the following assertions:
apocalypsehow
Mar 2013
#42