Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Gun Control Reform Activism
In reply to the discussion: Registration of all handguns. [View all]apocalypsehow
(12,751 posts)21. No, it's not a false analogy. I purchased an item the state has determined needs to be kept track of
regardless of the motivations for doing so, and so the law requires that it be registered and tagged.
The state could - and should - do the exact same thing with handguns, period.
"You may drive it untagged and unregistered on private property to your hearts content"
No, you cannot. In order to obtain a title to the vehicle showing proof of ownership, you must register and tag the car regardless of what you intend to do with it. Without obtaining said title - i.e., registering and tagging it - you cannot obtain car insurance or renew your drivers license. This myth of "you may drive it untagged and unregistered in private property" is a long-time strawman of the pro-NRA crowd, but it has been checked into and debunked repeatedly.
"But that's not how registration with guns would work"
Oh yes it is. And someday, will.
The state could - and should - do the exact same thing with handguns, period.
"You may drive it untagged and unregistered on private property to your hearts content"
No, you cannot. In order to obtain a title to the vehicle showing proof of ownership, you must register and tag the car regardless of what you intend to do with it. Without obtaining said title - i.e., registering and tagging it - you cannot obtain car insurance or renew your drivers license. This myth of "you may drive it untagged and unregistered in private property" is a long-time strawman of the pro-NRA crowd, but it has been checked into and debunked repeatedly.
"But that's not how registration with guns would work"
Oh yes it is. And someday, will.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
53 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I disagree with your characterization of '1%' or 'loonies' being paranoid about this issue.
AtheistCrusader
Mar 2013
#3
One thing to keep in mind is that gun owners fear paying expensive fees each year with registration
NutmegYankee
Mar 2013
#13
So? Get rid of them. If you have a dog, you have to purchase a liscence for EACH ONE
graham4anything
Mar 2013
#14
So? So what. The entire issue needs to be reframed. And a new SCOTUS to reinterpret.
graham4anything
Mar 2013
#16
I bought a new car two weeks ago and - guess what! - the state is now requiring me to register and
apocalypsehow
Mar 2013
#19
No, it's not a false analogy. I purchased an item the state has determined needs to be kept track of
apocalypsehow
Mar 2013
#21
okay - so you agree that it's not the norm and that for the most part people don't do this?
ellisonz
Mar 2013
#25
Yes, you did move the goalposts and followed the so-moving up with more meaningless jazz:
apocalypsehow
Mar 2013
#31
Except, it's not a "thought": it's been proven. The reason you chose not to reply to #31
apocalypsehow
Mar 2013
#36
By-the-bye, for those keeping count: "But I will finish with this response," Nutmeg Yankee, #32.
apocalypsehow
Mar 2013
#40
He saw the best bet in this lop-sided "debate" he was losing was to self-delete and Run! Run! Run!
apocalypsehow
Mar 2013
#43
No, it's not. This is 2013, not 1913. Post links, please, proving the following assertions:
apocalypsehow
Mar 2013
#42