Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Glaug-Eldare

(1,089 posts)
9. How about this?
Sat Aug 17, 2013, 04:11 PM
Aug 2013

I was thinkin' about this very question a while back, and I think I've got a way to get it done with a much weaker Constitutional issue, if any. Currently, only FFLs are required by federal law to conduct background checks, and only some states have laws in place to cover private sales. That could be made universal by tweaking the current law regarding FFLs, making a state's access to NICS contingent on creating a scheme to cover private sales. That is, unless a state requires and facilitates NICS checks for private sales, FFLs in that state will be completely unable to import stock, transfer firearms, or basically do anything. There should be minimum standards for access and affordability (e.g., it would be illegal to require sellers to travel to a remote police outpost in the desert and pay a $300 fee in order to sell a gun) which the states must maintain, or else face other penalties.

I favor a scheme like Maryland's, where if you choose not to pay an FFL transfer fee of $75 or more, you can have any state police barracks run the NICS check for you for $10.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control Reform Activism»Perhaps the best approach...»Reply #9