Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

sked14

(579 posts)
44. It would seem that you didn't even bother to read the thread, but instead
Fri Feb 14, 2014, 02:28 PM
Feb 2014

went on the attack immediately, why is that?

You go guy/girl! We can all work for this, we just have to actually WORK for it. flamin lib Feb 2014 #1
Guy. sked14 Feb 2014 #2
I assumed as much as guns & guys seem to go together but flamin lib Feb 2014 #5
I think the OP doesn't actually believe in any gun control CreekDog Feb 2014 #60
Exactly, and he is most likely billh58 Feb 2014 #61
well someone should welcome him back CreekDog Feb 2014 #62
LOL! billh58 Feb 2014 #63
Not a bad list. I'd prefer tougher toting restrictions in cities and limits on gun acquisition. Hoyt Feb 2014 #3
That might be reaching too far and invite a backlash from gun owners, sked14 Feb 2014 #4
I think it's time to stop worrying about a backlash from inconsiderate gun abusers. Seriously. Hoyt Feb 2014 #6
I'm talking about the gun owners who vote, don't discount them, sked14 Feb 2014 #7
The vast majority of gun abusers are right/white wingers. I doubt there are many true Democrats Hoyt Feb 2014 #8
And this is exactly why gun threads denigrate into sked14 Feb 2014 #10
A is the meme that tough gun laws will cost us votes. It won't. Those that obsessed with gunz Hoyt Feb 2014 #12
We will never have Australia or UK style gun laws, sked14 Feb 2014 #15
We won't if we keep proposing laws that won't stop gun proliferation and gun love. Hoyt Feb 2014 #19
I agree that we, as a nation, need to do something, sked14 Feb 2014 #20
Do you really think a Democrat that has a gun or 2 for hunting or home defense would feel alienated Hoyt Feb 2014 #21
The majority of gun owners these days aren't about hunting, sked14 Feb 2014 #22
Sorry, I don't think true Democrats will vote Republican over gunz. Hoyt Feb 2014 #23
Vote repub?.. never. SQUEE Feb 2014 #28
Sorry, withholding a vote is a vote for a Republican. You'd do that over gunz? Hoyt Feb 2014 #30
No, a vote for a Republican is a vote for a Republican. SQUEE Feb 2014 #32
Sorry that you are that enamored with gunz. I guess it's tough breaking free for some folks. Hoyt Feb 2014 #33
And there he goes. Packerowner740 Feb 2014 #26
There is that NRA billh58 Feb 2014 #45
Whatever, you seem to want nothing more than to argue rather than sked14 Feb 2014 #46
No, I want to make sure that billh58 Feb 2014 #47
No, what you want to do is attack anyone who has differing view than you do sked14 Feb 2014 #48
So you are setting billh58 Feb 2014 #39
So you're just looking for a confrontation instead of a meaningful sked14 Feb 2014 #40
"Meaningful dialog" billh58 Feb 2014 #41
If that's what you want to believe, then carry on, sked14 Feb 2014 #42
This message was self-deleted by its author billh58 Feb 2014 #43
It would seem that you didn't even bother to read the thread, but instead sked14 Feb 2014 #44
sked14 was banned by the admins CreekDog Feb 2014 #55
And rightfully so as he was billh58 Feb 2014 #56
Let's not fall into the trap of painting with a broad brush. flamin lib Feb 2014 #13
You'll find he has a pretty extreme way of getting his ideas out there Packerowner740 Feb 2014 #25
It's really hard to legislate by description. flamin lib Feb 2014 #9
I really wouldn't mind paying a little bit more for ammo, sked14 Feb 2014 #11
I think a little more is needed. Hoyt Feb 2014 #14
I'd be willing to go as high as 5 cents more per bullet, anything sked14 Feb 2014 #17
You're preaching to the choir in here. SecularMotion Feb 2014 #16
Yeah, but it's out there and that's something' nt flamin lib Feb 2014 #18
I agree with everything except number 6 Packerowner740 Feb 2014 #24
Nobody with a 9mm will accept #7. indie9197 Feb 2014 #27
I see your point. sked14 Feb 2014 #29
Maybe it is irrational to think you need that capacity. In any event, that just shows gun fanciers Hoyt Feb 2014 #31
It's exactly your type of comments, along with the extreme fringes like Nugent, sked14 Feb 2014 #34
Anyone that thinks they need 14 or 16 capacity mags is delusional. I'm sorry, that's a fact. Hoyt Feb 2014 #37
Well then, carry on. sked14 Feb 2014 #38
You seem to have upset billh58 Feb 2014 #35
Who would that be? sked14 Feb 2014 #36
If you're still lurking, now billh58 Feb 2014 #57
30 rounds for "long rifles" ellisonz Feb 2014 #49
Also, the Castle Doctrine isn't all that different from Stand Your Ground. ellisonz Feb 2014 #50
I'm fine with most of that shenmue Feb 2014 #51
Kudos! David2775 Feb 2014 #52
Hey there! Kingofalldems Feb 2014 #53
I like those ideas. flightplan Feb 2014 #54
Welcome back. billh58 Feb 2014 #58
Huh? flightplan Feb 2014 #59
Howdy, Marshal! Hassin Bin Sober Feb 2014 #64
Message auto-removed Name removed Feb 2014 #65
you're repeating yourself CreekDog Feb 2014 #66
Message auto-removed Name removed Feb 2014 #67
Well Mr. flightplan, billh58 Feb 2014 #68
Don't you just love billh58 Feb 2014 #69
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control Reform Activism»Here's what I think shoul...»Reply #44