Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

deathrind

(1,786 posts)
1. Mr. Martinez is right.
Tue May 27, 2014, 10:22 PM
May 2014

There are plenty of ideas out there to restrict the ability of people to acquire firearms who should not have them (like wait periods to perform comprehensive back ground check, annual registration/permts, requiring some form of liability insurance) that would in no way infringe on the 2nd Amendments "vaguely" stated right to own a "firearm" but we have a congress that is wholly owned (both sides) by big business and their lobbying efforts. Congress is not rudderless...it's rudder is steered by money from organizations like the NRA not common sense.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control Reform Activism»"Christopher Michael...»Reply #1