Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Populist Reform of the Democratic Party
In reply to the discussion: How everyone looks bad because Bill Clinton met with Loretta Lynch [View all]merrily
(45,251 posts)23. You are mistaken again. It's easy to say a poster is wrong if you pretend
pretend the poster said something they never said.
Your post 22 reads as though I claimed that Reagan was not called the Teflon President, or that I said Reagan was not called that before Clinton was. However, I never said either of those things. To the contrary. I said that Clinton was called that as well . That is right in the subject line of Reply 21.
Originally, I said only that Clinton was called "Teflon" and, as the links in my prior post proved, people did call him "Teflon, both while he was a candidate and after he became President.
You, however, claimed flatly that no one ever called Clinton the Teflon President, as follows:
Nobody dubbed Clinton the Teflon President.
However, that claim of yours is incorrect, as the links in my prior post proved.
You've now twice incorrectly claimed I was wrong. Something tells me you'll go for a third time, but the posts and the links speak for themselves.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
45 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1f1b5/1f1b53f91e926ad0db7c9b92e8d3ffc04fd25ac1" alt=""
You know that how? Be as pissed off as you want, but I'm guessing the Clintons still speak to each
merrily
Jul 2016
#15
I agree that, from all reports, AG Lynch did not have anything to do with this.
merrily
Jul 2016
#45
Perhaps you would prefer Ryan Grim's HuffPo piece: "Man, Bill Clinton Is An Idiot"
demwing
Jul 2016
#9
NO, seriously. Clinton was just ambling around on the tarmac and bumped into Lynch.
R. Daneel Olivaw
Jul 2016
#35
It doesn't matter what they discussed, just as it didn't matter what Scalia and Cheney discussed
merrily
Jul 2016
#18
"Rightwing faux outrage". That's what this is. Period. Too bad too many on this board who are happy
BlueCaliDem
Jul 2016
#27
Naw. Just stating the facts, R. Strange you have a problem with that. You'd otherwise not
BlueCaliDem
Jul 2016
#39
personal opinion = false premise not supported by fact - "how everyone looks bad..."
msongs
Jul 2016
#11
Lynch said it made her look bad. Your criticism of posting unsupported personal opinion is ironic.
merrily
Jul 2016
#14
And then they're silent about the Federal lawsuit filed against Trump for allegedly sexually
BlueCaliDem
Jul 2016
#28
Haven't heard a darn thing about that lately, either. It's all Lynch and Bill. Lynch and Bill. Lynch
BlueCaliDem
Jul 2016
#32