Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Populist Reform of the Democratic Party
In reply to the discussion: More Reasons to Tell Our President "No TPP" and "No Fast Track" [View all]jwirr
(39,215 posts)16. Absolutely. What I think should be done is speech not allowed on DU. Corporations have always
been the ones leading this change in business models. When we march in DC we are protesting their flunkies and will never get anywhere. Boycotting is also a tool but it seldom works because not enough people join in.
One of the biggest problems in fighting the corporations is that we do not know who owns them. Who their stock holders are. In fact we may even be some of the owners through our savings accounts which are invested by the banksters for us.
We need to study the corporations and find their weak spots. Then we might be able to act.
I also would not mind then leaving as long as they cannot take it with them. I love the idea of worker owned or coop businesses. It was the way this nation was built.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
63 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
The best way to do that is to not buy their stuff. Boycotts work, starve the beast, take away
sabrina 1
Jan 2015
#12
Exactly, focus on one at a time. Boycotts are probably the most effective means
sabrina 1
Jan 2015
#19
Precisely because boycotts speak the one language these corporate behemoths understand...
elzenmahn
Jan 2015
#20
Absolutely. What I think should be done is speech not allowed on DU. Corporations have always
jwirr
Jan 2015
#16
NAFTA "forced" American workers to compete with Mexican workers, but the sky has not fallen.
Fred Sanders
Jan 2015
#14
If I understand the TPP correctly the corporations that have businesses in Vietnam would then
jwirr
Jan 2015
#18
Are you supporting the TPP? Are you trying to convince us that it won't be so bad?
rhett o rick
Jan 2015
#22
I trust the President so of course I support him, I can see some positions opposing a free trade
Fred Sanders
Jan 2015
#32
This is way more than merely a "free trade agreement". What the President is asking is for us to
rhett o rick
Jan 2015
#33
No, the other wing does not support those things, silly to say so.....but it makes for better copy.
Fred Sanders
Jan 2015
#34
You claim the "other" wing doesn't support those issues but the facts indicate otherwise.
rhett o rick
Jan 2015
#35
"Populist Reform" should encourage debate, not suppress it, and contextual abuse is what should not
Fred Sanders
Jan 2015
#41
Your condescending use of "lollipops" could perhaps be appropriate if you were referring to the
Faryn Balyncd
Jan 2015
#39
The jobless rate in America today is no worse than the historical average...."lost jobs" are as impossible
Fred Sanders
Jan 2015
#45
Are you claiming that no jobs were lost by moving manufacturing overseas? nm
rhett o rick
Jan 2015
#47
Please. What jobs were gained by America, .i.e. meat exports, heavy equipment, aircraft, etc., what was
Fred Sanders
Jan 2015
#48
Since you continue to provide your argument via questions, we have to guess at your actual
rhett o rick
Jan 2015
#50
And another side-step. I am not using questions to avoid stating my point. In fact
rhett o rick
Jan 2015
#56
Yes, perhaps, "jackshit" does have a technical economic science definition...meaning to ignore jobs
Fred Sanders
Jan 2015
#54
"#8. Wall Street would benefit at the expense of everyone else. Under TPP, governments would be ....
Faryn Balyncd
Jan 2015
#21
It's worse than ignorance. Ignorance can be treated with education. But many Americans
rhett o rick
Jan 2015
#31
worse than ignorance. If the president told them to give all their money to Jamie
Doctor_J
Jan 2015
#40
The kicker: "#10 The TPP has no expiration date, making it virtually impossible to repeal."
Faryn Balyncd
Jan 2015
#27