Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Populist Reform of the Democratic Party
In reply to the discussion: Ready for Hillary? How About a Mass Populist Party Instead? [View all]RiverLover
(7,830 posts)7. That's for sure. Its needed.
So sad that so many people can't survive on what companies pay, and the taxpayers must subsidize their survival, while corporate executives & majority stockholders are living like kings. Or lords & the mass of people are their serfs.
We need a livable wage. Good for Oregon, leading the nation! I hope
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
139 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
The author doesn't suggest having a third party by Nov 2016. It says we can't in fact.
RiverLover
Apr 2015
#8
Not sure why you had to ask then. You replied to me, not the other way around. n/t
Thor_MN
Apr 2015
#36
Apparently, the context eluded you, despite your claims. Jim Lane for the win. n/t
Thor_MN
Apr 2015
#47
No, the content eluded me which is why I asked you to elaborate, which you failed to do. n/t
cui bono
Apr 2015
#50
How would you know what I know? All you've done here is evade a simple question.
cui bono
Apr 2015
#89
I've read your replies to me and if there was an answer to my initial question I guess I missed it.
cui bono
Apr 2015
#96
Really? You posted about 10 replies to me yet none of them answered my initial question.
cui bono
Apr 2015
#129
Um no. I said I knew of the situation. I have yet to be told what you were talking about. n/t
cui bono
Apr 2015
#131
Then I'll ask again for you to point me to the post that has the answer to my question.
cui bono
Apr 2015
#133
Because I'm a temperate person, cautious in my statements, and they're not. (n/t)
Jim Lane
Apr 2015
#63
I agree he is for his work in consumer protection. As to his running for president,
NoJusticeNoPeace
Apr 2015
#126
How long are you willing to wait for the revolution? How many American children have to
rhett o rick
Apr 2015
#78
Those that advocate for HRC and the 1% do so for one of two reasons IMO. One they honestly
rhett o rick
Apr 2015
#99
Strawman!! No one is saying that H. Clinton will "have destroyed everything by 2020".
rhett o rick
Apr 2015
#98
Dems already have the infrastructure. Why not make it the populist party again? n/t
eridani
Apr 2015
#19
By having progressives run for school boards, water districts, city councils etc
eridani
Apr 2015
#25
Well I for one, would rather be in a party that appreciates liberals and progressives than one that
cui bono
Apr 2015
#35
We don't get the centrists on board. We do to them what the Tea Party did to the RINOs
eridani
Apr 2015
#41
But the only reason we have people from the Republican Party in the Dem Party now is because both
cui bono
Apr 2015
#37
Excellent article! Greece's last election is a truly hopeful sign that the winds of change AGAINST
sabrina 1
Apr 2015
#97
I never said I wanted a third party. Ever. I posted an article that says one day
RiverLover
Apr 2015
#138