Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Raine1967

(11,617 posts)
4. Still perusing, but I noticed that the word urban was only mentioned once.
Tue Jul 21, 2015, 02:28 PM
Jul 2015

and it was from MO'M:

Though I support the reauthorization of ESEA, there are a number of areas where the law needs improvements — most notably, a requirement for turning around our lowest-performing schools. This legislation must acknowledge that equitable allocation of resources for our most vulnerable kids is not the same as equal allocation of resources. As a nation, we must commit to concentrating federal dollars where the need is greatest, including in the communities with the most underperforming schools and students. As our well-performing suburban schools find new and innovative ways to connect a child’s learning experience with their real-world environment, our lower-income urban schools can’t be left behind.


He gets this.

BS and MO'M both want to expand Social Security and want to life the cap on the payroll tax. I like that.



Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Martin O'Malley»"What do you think t...»Reply #4