Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Martin O'Malley

Fred Sanders

(23,946 posts)

1. ONE picture of the aftermath of the Sandy Hook massacre or Oregon or any...the conversation would

Reply to elleng (Original post)

Mon Oct 5, 2015, 03:25 PM

Oct 2015

change.

ONE picture of what bloody carnage one gun can do as it rips flesh and bone and maims and kills with such efficiency and ease.

Why are these pictures suppressed? Do not tell me dozens do not exist. They do but are not even mentioned.

Would this offend the gentle sensibilities of gentle America where you can turn on a TV for an hour and witness moving pictures of carnage of all kinds?

If fetuses are human beings for which the GOP has no problem with showing gruesome pictures of these dead "babies"....then what is the objection to gruesome pictures of older children slaughtered by guns?

Gun death and mayhem is gruesome beyond imagining. Daily happening in America....and look, ma, still no terrorist killings at all - other than the daily terrorism of The Gun.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

1 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

"294 mass shootings in 274 days [View all] elleng Oct 2015 OP

ONE picture of the aftermath of the Sandy Hook massacre or Oregon or any...the conversation would Fred Sanders Oct 2015 #1