Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Working Poor
In reply to the discussion: If You Are Obese And Don't Even Try To Eat Healthy Why Should I Have To Pay For Your Medical Care? [View all]mercuryblues
(15,077 posts)73. That is not what
new studies are finding.
It has to do with resting metabolism, which determines how many calories a person burns when at rest. When the show began, the contestants, though hugely overweight, had normal metabolisms for their size, meaning they were burning a normal number of calories for people of their weight. When it ended, their metabolisms had slowed radically and their bodies were not burning enough calories to maintain their thinner sizes.
Researchers knew that just about anyone who deliberately loses weight even if they start at a normal weight or even underweight will have a slower metabolism when the diet ends. So they were not surprised to see that The Biggest Loser contestants had slow metabolisms when the show ended.
What shocked the researchers was what happened next: As the years went by and the numbers on the scale climbed, the contestants metabolisms did not recover. They became even slower, and the pounds kept piling on. It was as if their bodies were intensifying their effort to pull the contestants back to their original weight.
Mr. Cahill was one of the worst off. As he regained more than 100 pounds, his metabolism slowed so much that, just to maintain his current weight of 295 pounds, he now has to eat 800 calories a day less than a typical man his size. Anything more turns to fat.
snip
Slower metabolisms were not the only reason the contestants regained weight, though. They constantly battled hunger, cravings and binges. The investigators found at least one reason: plummeting levels of leptin. The contestants started out with normal levels of leptin. By the seasons finale, they had almost no leptin at all, which would have made them ravenous all the time. As their weight returned, their leptin levels drifted up again, but only to about half of what they had been when the season began, the researchers found, thus helping to explain their urges to eat.
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/05/02/health/biggest-loser-weight-loss.html?_r=0
Researchers knew that just about anyone who deliberately loses weight even if they start at a normal weight or even underweight will have a slower metabolism when the diet ends. So they were not surprised to see that The Biggest Loser contestants had slow metabolisms when the show ended.
What shocked the researchers was what happened next: As the years went by and the numbers on the scale climbed, the contestants metabolisms did not recover. They became even slower, and the pounds kept piling on. It was as if their bodies were intensifying their effort to pull the contestants back to their original weight.
Mr. Cahill was one of the worst off. As he regained more than 100 pounds, his metabolism slowed so much that, just to maintain his current weight of 295 pounds, he now has to eat 800 calories a day less than a typical man his size. Anything more turns to fat.
snip
Slower metabolisms were not the only reason the contestants regained weight, though. They constantly battled hunger, cravings and binges. The investigators found at least one reason: plummeting levels of leptin. The contestants started out with normal levels of leptin. By the seasons finale, they had almost no leptin at all, which would have made them ravenous all the time. As their weight returned, their leptin levels drifted up again, but only to about half of what they had been when the season began, the researchers found, thus helping to explain their urges to eat.
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/05/02/health/biggest-loser-weight-loss.html?_r=0
TopBack to the top of the page
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
ShareGet links to this post
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
Cannot edit, recommend, or reply in locked discussions
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
112 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
If You Are Obese And Don't Even Try To Eat Healthy Why Should I Have To Pay For Your Medical Care? [View all]
scottie55
May 2016
OP
Because greed and selfishness are not good things. I'm serious, with your point of view, you should
Kip Humphrey
May 2016
#4
wow, are you certain you are on the correct board? or did you forget the sarcasm thingy?
niyad
May 2016
#6
Yes, with the added bonus of their body fighting against the drastic weight loss.
LisaM
May 2016
#96
He pays for educating kids because one day he will need an educated kid to replace a
Ohioblue22
May 2016
#103
I was just making a point on that one example otherwise I agree with you..... nt
Ohioblue22
May 2016
#108
I have to admit but would never say it (OP)or fight against it but this yes and cigs and liqour too
Person 2713
May 2016
#9
wow. You might want to post your picture so that we can make sure we want to pay for your premiums.
peace13
May 2016
#10
That's kind of like saying taking a bath is dangerous because people drown in bathtubs
Major Nikon
May 2016
#31
You don't pay for anything. You pay for taxes. You don't actually get to personally
silvershadow
May 2016
#13
I'd rather stop paying to send people out to get blown up for starters. That would cover
brewens
May 2016
#68
Aside from the nastiness, how does this in any way fit the SOP for this group?
uppityperson
May 2016
#17
I also resent paying for people who live in the country, or drive cars when they might get hurt
LiberalArkie
May 2016
#24
Were you cheering at that Republican debate where they wanted the uninsured to die?
procon
May 2016
#26
OK, so after getting chewed out by DUers, now you claim you're really not "mean"?
procon
May 2016
#63
If you run or bike when you don't have to and get injured, why should I pay for yours?
whatthehey
May 2016
#28
Running Is Hard On My Body and Bicycles Are Dangerous If You have To Be On Streets
scottie55
May 2016
#36
If people are not going to work to educate themselves, why should I pay for their education.
Agnosticsherbet
May 2016
#32
You are not paying for someone to eat themselves to death. You are helping pay for everyone's health
Agnosticsherbet
May 2016
#46
The Art of the Closed Mind. Anyone can learn it. Few are foolish enough to admit it.
floriduck
May 2016
#40
I have to say that almost every truely obese person I have ever been around really
brewens
May 2016
#60
Because cancer, some heart diseases, kidney failure and several other expensive diseases
LastLiberal in PalmSprings
May 2016
#75
I bet you're the kind of guy that feels helpful fat-shamin the overwieght.
Ed Suspicious
May 2016
#101