Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
Joe BidenCongratulations to our presumptive Democratic nominee, Joe Biden!
 

George II

(67,782 posts)
7. If the bailout didn't occur and the banks failed, MILLIONS of Americans in the 99% would have lost..
Sat Mar 14, 2020, 04:02 PM
Mar 2020

....their retirement funds.

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Joe Biden
Of course the actions of the Obama administration comradebillyboy Mar 2020 #1
Sanders did not want to guillotine the bankers. This opinion piece is wrong when it says... thesquanderer Mar 2020 #8
I understand but lots of lefties demanded that they comradebillyboy Mar 2020 #12
Sanders was not demanding prosecutions. But he wanted the bailout financed differently. thesquanderer Mar 2020 #16
I don't recall mentioning Sanders in my post so why are you comradebillyboy Mar 2020 #18
I thought your initial post was agreeing with the opinion piece in the OP... thesquanderer Mar 2020 #21
They had broken the law c_junk Mar 2020 #25
I wonder what BS thinks would have happened to the assets Hav Mar 2020 #2
Interesting how throwing Wellstone ruled Mar 2020 #3
Oh ouch!! Thekaspervote Mar 2020 #4
The bailout was necessary - for bankers to get their bonuses... PoliticAverse Mar 2020 #5
It was centrist, business as usual, patty cake with Wall Street. Magoo48 Mar 2020 #6
Eoooo "Centrists".. omg! Cha Mar 2020 #15
You didn't say I was wrong. Magoo48 Mar 2020 #19
"Centrists"!!! omg Moderates who Won us the House in 2018! Cha Mar 2020 #23
If the bailout didn't occur and the banks failed, MILLIONS of Americans in the 99% would have lost.. George II Mar 2020 #7
Sanders supported a bailout, but thought it needed to be fixed, as he explained at the time... thesquanderer Mar 2020 #9
He always has a reason for voting against something he "supports". George II Mar 2020 #10
Who doesn't? Most votes of significance are a balance of good and bad, and you have to decide... thesquanderer Mar 2020 #11
OF course.. "Enough Already! Thank you, SunSeeker! Cha Mar 2020 #13
Just one more thing to add to the long and growing list of reasons I cannot stand him. NurseJackie Mar 2020 #14
Sanders was in favor of the bailout, but not the way it was financed. thesquanderer Mar 2020 #17
There's always an excuse for him, isn't there? I've had enough excuses. NurseJackie Mar 2020 #20
Quite a few other Senators voted the same way Sanders did... thesquanderer Mar 2020 #22
He can never find a way to justify voting for the good. NurseJackie Mar 2020 #24
re: "He can never find a way to justify voting for the good." thesquanderer Mar 2020 #26
He's a fly in the ointment. That's really nothing to be proud of. NurseJackie Mar 2020 #29
I gave you examples of the crime bill and obamacare, which I guess you count as some of... thesquanderer Mar 2020 #30
Brady bill. (And I'm sure there's a "reasonable excuse" for that as well, eh?) NurseJackie Mar 2020 #31
I guess you typed that before I edited to include a gimme for the gun votes. thesquanderer Mar 2020 #32
HIPAA. NurseJackie Mar 2020 #33
Sanders voted yes on HIPAA like everyone else. thesquanderer Mar 2020 #34
So his smears and lies about the Democratic party are okay with you? NurseJackie Mar 2020 #35
re" Nobody is bashing Bernie" - Of course they are, with lies and misrepresentations, thesquanderer Mar 2020 #38
You've got a computer, look it up yourself. NurseJackie Mar 2020 #39
You mean HIPAA? I DID look it up. That's how I got the link I posted before... thesquanderer Mar 2020 #40
You know exactly what I'm talking about. NurseJackie Mar 2020 #41
Looks like you posted that before seeing my 1:05 edit, which I made when I realized... thesquanderer Mar 2020 #42
Yes... because my response of "HIPAA" may have been referring to something other than HIPAA. NurseJackie Mar 2020 #43
I think you've mixed up the posts. I was replying to your post #39. thesquanderer Mar 2020 #44
I told you already: You're on your own. I'm tired of these games. NurseJackie Mar 2020 #45
I did not insinuate you were a liar/dishonest. thesquanderer Mar 2020 #46
Now you're splitting hairs and making a very weak argument. NurseJackie Mar 2020 #47
Look at the time stamps. It was edited BEFORE you replied, thesquanderer Mar 2020 #48
Doesn't matter. I saw what I saw and you edited while I was typing. NurseJackie Mar 2020 #49
In the interest of complete transparency... thesquanderer Mar 2020 #50
It really doesn't matter what the reason or motivation was for editing... NurseJackie Mar 2020 #51
Again, saying that someone may be pulling something out of their ass (if they can't support it)... thesquanderer Mar 2020 #53
Thanks for proving my point. NurseJackie Mar 2020 #54
re: "Did you or did you not edit for your own benefit? Case closed." thesquanderer Mar 2020 #55
No... NurseJackie Mar 2020 #56
Two things... thesquanderer Mar 2020 #57
One uncomfortable item that I have come to believe is that Senator Sanders, Blue_true Mar 2020 #28
I don't disagree with Bernie that bankers got off too light, BUT.... Happy Hoosier Mar 2020 #27
They should have bailed out the home owners. iwannaknow Mar 2020 #36
Of course. But they could get that passed. Dems did what they could do. SunSeeker Mar 2020 #37
Too Big To Fail...Too Big To Exist BidenBacker Mar 2020 #52
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Democratic Primaries»WaPo: On the 2008 bailou...»Reply #7