Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

MBS

(9,688 posts)
5. I agree with you on this, too.
Thu Feb 20, 2020, 08:42 PM
Feb 2020

The fashion here seems to be to dump on Iowa right now.
But Iowa plays an important role in a couple of ways. First, the caucus system allows for actual conversation among voters about the candidates, and serves as an initial winnowing of non-viable candidates. And Iowa voters take their role very seriously.
Also, Iowa, along with New Hampshire and, to a somewhat lesser extent, Nevada and South Carolina, play a special role in that these are among the few places where presidential candidates have the opportunity, and also the responsibility, to meet voters "up close and personal." It's not only good for the voters: it's essential learning for the presidential candidates themselves.

Otherwise, it's campaigning by remote: by TV ad and mass rallies and online rants, which does not serve our country well.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Buttigieg 2020»Afghanistan veteran talks...»Reply #5