Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Democrats should not delay Amy Coney Barrett's nomination. Let it proceed. [View all]Raven
(14,132 posts)3. I agree. I think they should be extremely polite to her and let the press dig up the ugly truth
about the cult she belongs to.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
112 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Democrats should not delay Amy Coney Barrett's nomination. Let it proceed. [View all]
Yavin4
Sep 2020
OP
I agree. I think they should be extremely polite to her and let the press dig up the ugly truth
Raven
Sep 2020
#3
But all these view came out about a year ago when she came up for the federal bench.
progressive nobody
Sep 2020
#4
She won't lie, she'll deflect because she can, knowing the sheep will vote her through anyway.
OnDoutside
Sep 2020
#15
Lying under oath would make her the second impeachable justice, if dems are in control and they
TryLogic
Sep 2020
#94
I strive to learn something new every day I'm alive. DU helps enormously in achieving
WheelWalker
Sep 2020
#81
THIS!!! This is what I've been waiting for. Catch this woman lying, and we'll impeach both of them.
BComplex
Sep 2020
#73
democrats have no way delay, bottom line all attempts will end with same outcome
beachbumbob
Sep 2020
#13
Yup- this guarantees we take the Senate- then we must push to expand SCOTUS
Fiendish Thingy
Sep 2020
#18
I was afraid that it would be Logoa. That would have been a better political move.
Yavin4
Sep 2020
#20
Make Collins and Gardner explain to their constituents why they're putting an extremist
Yavin4
Sep 2020
#21
You don't ask her how she will rule. You ask about her opinions and past writings.
Yavin4
Sep 2020
#26
I agree. Don't waste time and give the GOP a forum to spew more of their gaslighting.
Boogiemack
Sep 2020
#25
I wouldn't be surprised if there is are no hearings and mcconnell just brings her to a vote
mucifer
Sep 2020
#36
If he sets that precedent he'll make it easier for the Democrats to expand the court
Buckeyeblue
Sep 2020
#71
Agree with you points Yavin4. We also need to have every democrat running on the Nov 3rd ballot
iluvtennis
Sep 2020
#47
NO FUCKING WAY. the media needs to blue dress this since mitch stole obama's JC pick.
pansypoo53219
Sep 2020
#53
I say the senate and the WH are more important than the court - assuming we have to choose,
TryLogic
Sep 2020
#99
I want them to ask her if she makes a ruling and her husband disagrees with it will she change
Maraya1969
Sep 2020
#66
They also need to make her answer over and over about when it is appropriate
OregonBlue
Sep 2020
#76
Get in there with her, get her comfortable, get intel that can force her later recusals, or
ancianita
Sep 2020
#83
Defend who??? They have no problem defending a rapist/racist/sociopath. Loser strategy. Fight back.
58Sunliner
Sep 2020
#101