Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

onenote

(44,862 posts)
16. Agreed. But sadly, I could see some judge interpreting that provision as not applying.
Mon Oct 28, 2024, 03:41 PM
Oct 28

On its face it applies to the destruction, defacement, mutilation or other alteration of the marking of a paper ballot which has been cast in an election where those actions are taken within a year following the election. While the law should be interpreted to apply to this situation on the theory that once early voting starts, the election has started and any ballots deposited in an early voting ballot box have been "cast" in that election, and therefore charges under that section should be brought, given some of the decisions I've seen involving voting, such as the recent decision holding that mailed ballots, even if postmarked before the election, can't be counted if received after election day, I wouldn't be surprised if some judge tried to interpret the provision as not applying to early ballots.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Juliette Kayyem on ballot...»Reply #16