Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Merrick Garland . . . . [View all]Fiendish Thingy
(18,996 posts)23. Grief induced nonsense- here's a reality check:
https://www.emptywheel.net/2024/11/06/trump-sold-grievance-and-america-liked-what-he-was-selling/
Much, much more at link, with additional links to fact (as opposed to emotion) based evidence detailing how no amount of speed or aggressiveness on Garlands part would have made any difference in the election because of Trumps victim persona and the privilege obstacles and SCOTUS interference that would have happened on any timeline.
Flame away, I dont care, I remain firmly a principled member of the reality based community.
Once Trump got everyone hooked on his grievance drug, Merrick Garland was never going to make a difference.
I have tried, over and over, to explain how the investigation into Trump and his co-conspirators proceeded. More recently, Ive explained how you couldnt have charged Trump with insurrection the only thing that would have disqualified him from running until after May 2023, and had Jack Smith done so, it would have ended up exactly where we are here, with John Roberts delaying everything until after the election.
No effort to explain the process the two years of exploiting phones, the months of January 6 Committee delay, the ten months of privilege fights, the month Elon Musk stole, or the eight months John Roberts bought Trump none of that has mattered, of course. People needed an explanation for their own helplessness and Merrick Garland was the sparkle pony they hoped would save them.
But nothing Merrick Garland would have done would have mattered anyway.
I have tried, over and over, to explain how the investigation into Trump and his co-conspirators proceeded. More recently, Ive explained how you couldnt have charged Trump with insurrection the only thing that would have disqualified him from running until after May 2023, and had Jack Smith done so, it would have ended up exactly where we are here, with John Roberts delaying everything until after the election.
No effort to explain the process the two years of exploiting phones, the months of January 6 Committee delay, the ten months of privilege fights, the month Elon Musk stole, or the eight months John Roberts bought Trump none of that has mattered, of course. People needed an explanation for their own helplessness and Merrick Garland was the sparkle pony they hoped would save them.
But nothing Merrick Garland would have done would have mattered anyway.
Much, much more at link, with additional links to fact (as opposed to emotion) based evidence detailing how no amount of speed or aggressiveness on Garlands part would have made any difference in the election because of Trumps victim persona and the privilege obstacles and SCOTUS interference that would have happened on any timeline.
Flame away, I dont care, I remain firmly a principled member of the reality based community.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
3 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
65 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
While I agree with you, I shall refrain from blaming people like that for . . . .
Stinky The Clown
Nov 7
#10
He should keep him because he did dumps bidding the entire Biden administration.
onecaliberal
Nov 7
#7
Ya, thanks for nothing Merrick. To use a colloquialism that an old friend of mine
CentralMass
Nov 7
#8
No, this is not both sideism, it is an unabashed support and appreciation of Garland's tenure as AG.
Beastly Boy
Nov 7
#37
It took almost two years after the January 6th insurrection for Jack Smith to be appointed.
choie
Nov 7
#49
Do you have any fucking idea what it takes to appoint a fucking special counsel?
Beastly Boy
Nov 7
#61
Yes...him having done a slow walk against tfg, he will have to share the blame for the demise of our country
PortTack
Nov 7
#16
It is possible to express rage, disappointment and frustration without scapegoating
Fiendish Thingy
Nov 7
#33
And then it will be declared moot because he'll have access to those documents all over again
Orrex
Nov 7
#48
Someone with well-placed unnamed contacts used to attack people for doubting Garland
Orrex
Nov 7
#27
His dereliction of duty is unforgivable. If it were any other republican that won, I'd be able to stomach it
ecstatic
Nov 7
#31