General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Here's a compilation of the voter suppression / vote manipulation evidence so far... [View all]deepblue
(42 posts)From what I am reading, Spoonamoore is a real person, with legitimate business in the election integrity field. Spoonamore is taking a chance. All he says is to recount a few precincts to prove it out. Seems reasonable. It is reasonable. Should be done by the Dems without any prompting. We're dealing with insurrectionists and fifth columnists supported by a hostile foreign power.
Not one of the things in Digby's blog relate to the particular technique Spoonamoore describes. Yet you point to Digby's blog. The techniques in Digby's blog refer to the typically unprovable claims by relatively anonymous people. Spoonamoore's isn't one of them. It is reasonably exact, the person making the claim is real, and he is running a risk telling us about it. If he's wrong, he is likely out of business.
Recounts should have been asked for on spec. Nazis ain't honest. We don't need Spoonamoore to know we should be doing recounts.
As a related aside, my old man had a very good contact in Ohio state gov. In 2004, my father was informed that Ohio Secretary of State Ken Blackwell sat up with a spreadsheet adjusting vote totals as they came in live from a tabulator in Tennessee. This is exactly the technique Spoonamoore describes, except, apparently, it is now automated.