General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Here's a compilation of the voter suppression / vote manipulation evidence so far... [View all]deepblue
(42 posts)I am saying verify by checking a few precincts more closely. Why are you arguing this point? Spoonamoore has put it on the line. If it is a conspiracy theory Spoonamoore's is the best there is. If it is proven false, which is easily done, then we know very well the count is honest. Want to end conspiracy theories potentially affecting the mentality of Democrats? Investigate this claim.
Really, you shouldn't argue something if what you say is not significantly more important to the task or superior in evidence to what someone else says. Nazis cheat, you can't get around that, yet you say counting a few precincts is engaging a conspiracy theory, when it is not. Why argue, even if you are 100% correct? No big loss proving you right, something to gain if you are legitimately motivated.
I don't think you have a better argument.