General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Again, I have no idea when ALOT of us deny that nefarious things happened tht UPENDED the election.... [View all]TheKentuckian
(26,314 posts)When one says we was robbed no matter how I wish that to be the case rather than eating the L, there is a minimum obligation to identify specifically how so that can be investigated and the facts found.
I'm not saying you are wrong at all, you misunderstand.
I'm saying there is no direct evidence or even a functional accusation.
Also, what would prove to you that the election was legitimate?
If the answer is nothing but there is no evidence, then this is not from a place of reason even if it somehow later turns out to be true.
Our incredulity is not evidence, it isn't really even much of an argument.
I think at present the stop the steal argument is somehow weaker than the one four years ago because it was way closer and Powell at least spun up dead ass Hugo Chavez hacking the machines nonsense, we don't even have a theory this time just broad, deep, and general unease.