Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Please don't spread Spoonamore hoax [View all]pnwmom
(109,636 posts)73. I'm not saying the election WAS fixed. I'm saying there's enough evidence to show it COULD HAVE BEEN FIXED.
The breaches got caught long after they happened. The hackers weren't caught in the act. With the information we know they gained from the breach, they could have gone on to do damage we haven't learned about yet. We won't know unless we do a partial recount.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
5 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
127 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I'm not sure he's an actual computer security expert -- he calls himself a "computer security expert."
LauraInLA
Nov 21
#22
Spoonamore isn't the only computer expert calling for a recount. There is also the group of computer security experts
pnwmom
Nov 21
#25
The early results could of shown that difference and then as more results were included the difference disappeared
questionseverything
Nov 25
#104
All the evidence you need is that the breaches did occur. They had the opportunity. And the remedy is simple.
pnwmom
Nov 21
#34
They spent 4 years training us to defend the 2020 election, then all elections -- even though
pnwmom
Nov 21
#36
I'm not saying the election WAS fixed. I'm saying there's enough evidence to show it COULD HAVE BEEN FIXED.
pnwmom
Nov 21
#73
With the information gained in the breaches, they could have gone on to hack many more machines
pnwmom
Nov 25
#103
You don't know that. That's the point. It's very possible that the information gained in the breaches
pnwmom
Nov 26
#112
They don't need physical access to the machines on the day of the election. They could have tampered with
pnwmom
Nov 21
#37
yes. but even moreso, it's the memory cards. they are removed and repgrogrammed every election. n/t
garybeck
Nov 21
#47
Yes by insiders either from the machine company or the election office
questionseverything
Nov 21
#76
Every thing you said after the second sentence was incorrect, you are mixing me up with some one else
questionseverything
Nov 26
#113
I think it's interesting that the state of WA, which has only mail in ballots, kept under lock,
pnwmom
Nov 21
#48
You pretending you don't understand how a rig could be accomplished doesn't mean you are correct
questionseverything
Nov 27
#125