Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Bev54

(11,917 posts)
42. Can't read my mind but willing to misinterpret my comments and then insist to me
Sat Oct 5, 2024, 12:05 PM
Oct 5

what my point is. I have reread my comment and standby it.

isnt there some way to trace these threats? samnsara Oct 5 #1
3 years ago gab13by13 Oct 5 #4
She's been the head of the civil rights division of the doj since 2021. What's the hold up? Autumn Oct 5 #12
Good question. paleotn Oct 5 #14
This message was self-deleted by its author Chin music Oct 5 #20
Perhaps, to show that it is a markodochartaigh Oct 5 #47
Threats will continue until they prosecute, convict, incarcerate, fine PROMPTLY bucolic_frolic Oct 5 #5
I disagree that "nothing ever happens." D.U. has a small but steady stream of posts about people prosecuted for 3Hotdogs Oct 5 #6
Yeah, but that is smidgeon of the huge overall problem Bernardo de La Paz Oct 5 #10
Yes but they only have so many resources and many of these should be handled by the state. Bev54 Oct 5 #27
SCotUS? Flash: tRump is NOT president. Anyway, incitement to violence is never an official act. . . . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Oct 5 #35
He is still the head of the snake and if incitement is not an official act, please tell SCOTUS. Bev54 Oct 5 #36
You won't be able to show me where in the SCotUS decision it okays inciting violence Bernardo de La Paz Oct 5 #37
I am not overreacting in sense of the word and certainly did not make SCOTUS explicitly my point. Bev54 Oct 5 #39
I can't read your mind to know. I can only read what you actually post Bernardo de La Paz Oct 5 #41
Can't read my mind but willing to misinterpret my comments and then insist to me Bev54 Oct 5 #42
I read what you wrote. If you are the first to highlight SCotUS, then it is your point Bernardo de La Paz Oct 5 #44
Go bother someone else, I have zero interest in your opinion of my comment, nor your judgement. Bev54 Oct 5 #45
To avoid comment and replies, don't post publicly. . . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Oct 5 #46
You two need to get a room.... AZ8theist Oct 5 #49
The overlying problem has existed for years. The problem is local bodys (local governments) CAN NOT stop or control..... usaf-vet Oct 5 #13
Details too complicated for my simple mind bucolic_frolic Oct 5 #21
To complicated WAS exactly what I wanted to point out. Individuals CAN'T fix this level of complexity. Only goverments! usaf-vet Oct 5 #29
The interwebs have always been lawless. Regulations have always been patchwork. jaxexpat Oct 5 #30
I only know of one politician with the foresight to anticipate this phenomenon.... my one guy would be Paul Wellstone. usaf-vet Oct 5 #33
Thanks for the reminder. I'd forgotten. The PTB had their way with him for that. jaxexpat Oct 5 #34
jaxexpat............ Upthevibe Oct 5 #40
The 2000 election was a revelation of western civilization's fragility and ultimate collapse. jaxexpat Oct 5 #48
Because of course. The man-babies are mad that someone who flagrantly Scrivener7 Oct 5 #2
The flying MAGA monkeys are always ready.Bidenomics must've given them a lot of disposable income to play with Walleye Oct 5 #3
Yep. Exactly. paleotn Oct 5 #17
If you threaten a judge you must be tracked down and charged bottomofthehill Oct 5 #7
Trump has given folks the greenlight to bully Sugarmaggie Oct 5 #8
Spot on Evolve Dammit Oct 5 #53
When will law enforcement The Wizard Oct 5 #9
This is why doxxing is never okay. LisaM Oct 5 #11
Comes with the territory Mysterian Oct 5 #15
Prosecuting the threat mongers? Wapo did a story on just this topic the other day... paleotn Oct 5 #16
"as a practical matter, our government may need to step outside the letter of law" BumRushDaShow Oct 5 #22
I know. Trust me, I get it. It's dangerous but..... paleotn Oct 5 #26
Don't forget that a dozen Constitutional Amendments BumRushDaShow Oct 5 #31
Tina Peters would make a perfect Sovereign Citizen mdbl Oct 5 #18
Hope she isn't vain DENVERPOPS Oct 5 #54
I'd be more surprised if there WEREN'T threats from the MAGA terrorists LymphocyteLover Oct 5 #19
This message was self-deleted by its author Chin music Oct 5 #23
Least surprising news of the day, unfortunately. (nt) Paladin Oct 5 #24
Every time I read something like this KS Toronado Oct 5 #25
I'm not worried that there will be a bloodbath. They don't have enough loonies with guns to take over. flying_wahini Oct 5 #28
That's what I see, some outbreaks here and there KS Toronado Oct 5 #52
Sorry, but I disagree DENVERPOPS Oct 5 #55
You make some real valid points POPS KS Toronado Oct 5 #56
I sure hope DENVERPOPS Oct 5 #57
It is Double OO magnums KS Toronado Oct 5 #58
Oh Wow DENVERPOPS Oct 6 #60
Law enforcement needs to start dragging these people in Old Crank Oct 5 #32
BumRushDaShow....... Upthevibe Oct 5 #38
These creepoids are coming out of the woodwork DENVERPOPS Oct 6 #61
They just refuse to accept the TRUTH. She had a trial and was found GUILTY. She/other MAGATs are not above the law. iluvtennis Oct 5 #43
I listened to his full 15 minute sentencing speech. LuckyLib Oct 5 #50
Ivan Raiklin Rewarded by the Leo/Koch Donor Machine RTT Oct 5 #51
and that illustrates perfectly why she needed the long sentence she got prodigitalson Oct 5 #59
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Colorado judge who senten...»Reply #42