Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Colorado judge who sentenced election denier Tina Peters to prison receives threats [View all]
Bev54
(11,978 posts)45. Go bother someone else, I have zero interest in your opinion of my comment, nor your judgement.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
61 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Colorado judge who sentenced election denier Tina Peters to prison receives threats [View all]
BumRushDaShow
Oct 2024
OP
She's been the head of the civil rights division of the doj since 2021. What's the hold up?
Autumn
Oct 2024
#12
Threats will continue until they prosecute, convict, incarcerate, fine PROMPTLY
bucolic_frolic
Oct 2024
#5
I disagree that "nothing ever happens." D.U. has a small but steady stream of posts about people prosecuted for
3Hotdogs
Oct 2024
#6
Yes but they only have so many resources and many of these should be handled by the state.
Bev54
Oct 2024
#27
SCotUS? Flash: tRump is NOT president. Anyway, incitement to violence is never an official act. . . . . nt
Bernardo de La Paz
Oct 2024
#35
He is still the head of the snake and if incitement is not an official act, please tell SCOTUS.
Bev54
Oct 2024
#36
You won't be able to show me where in the SCotUS decision it okays inciting violence
Bernardo de La Paz
Oct 2024
#37
I am not overreacting in sense of the word and certainly did not make SCOTUS explicitly my point.
Bev54
Oct 2024
#39
I can't read your mind to know. I can only read what you actually post
Bernardo de La Paz
Oct 2024
#41
I read what you wrote. If you are the first to highlight SCotUS, then it is your point
Bernardo de La Paz
Oct 2024
#44
Go bother someone else, I have zero interest in your opinion of my comment, nor your judgement.
Bev54
Oct 2024
#45
The overlying problem has existed for years. The problem is local bodys (local governments) CAN NOT stop or control.....
usaf-vet
Oct 2024
#13
To complicated WAS exactly what I wanted to point out. Individuals CAN'T fix this level of complexity. Only goverments!
usaf-vet
Oct 2024
#29
The interwebs have always been lawless. Regulations have always been patchwork.
jaxexpat
Oct 2024
#30
I only know of one politician with the foresight to anticipate this phenomenon.... my one guy would be Paul Wellstone.
usaf-vet
Oct 2024
#33
Thanks for the reminder. I'd forgotten. The PTB had their way with him for that.
jaxexpat
Oct 2024
#34
The 2000 election was a revelation of western civilization's fragility and ultimate collapse.
jaxexpat
Oct 2024
#48
The flying MAGA monkeys are always ready.Bidenomics must've given them a lot of disposable income to play with
Walleye
Oct 2024
#3
Prosecuting the threat mongers? Wapo did a story on just this topic the other day...
paleotn
Oct 2024
#16
"as a practical matter, our government may need to step outside the letter of law"
BumRushDaShow
Oct 2024
#22
I'd be more surprised if there WEREN'T threats from the MAGA terrorists
LymphocyteLover
Oct 2024
#19
I'm not worried that there will be a bloodbath. They don't have enough loonies with guns to take over.
flying_wahini
Oct 2024
#28