Latest Breaking News

prodigitalson

(2,884 posts)

59. and that illustrates perfectly why she needed the long sentence she got

Reply to BumRushDaShow (Original post)

Sat Oct 5, 2024, 11:16 PM

Oct 5

hopefully her supporters making the threats can join her

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

61 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Colorado judge who sentenced election denier Tina Peters to prison receives threats [View all] BumRushDaShow Oct 5 OP

isnt there some way to trace these threats? samnsara Oct 5 #1

3 years ago gab13by13 Oct 5 #4

She's been the head of the civil rights division of the doj since 2021. What's the hold up? Autumn Oct 5 #12

Good question. paleotn Oct 5 #14

This message was self-deleted by its author Chin music Oct 5 #20

Perhaps, to show that it is a markodochartaigh Oct 5 #47

Threats will continue until they prosecute, convict, incarcerate, fine PROMPTLY bucolic_frolic Oct 5 #5

I disagree that "nothing ever happens." D.U. has a small but steady stream of posts about people prosecuted for 3Hotdogs Oct 5 #6

Yeah, but that is smidgeon of the huge overall problem Bernardo de La Paz Oct 5 #10

Yes but they only have so many resources and many of these should be handled by the state. Bev54 Oct 5 #27

SCotUS? Flash: tRump is NOT president. Anyway, incitement to violence is never an official act. . . . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Oct 5 #35

He is still the head of the snake and if incitement is not an official act, please tell SCOTUS. Bev54 Oct 5 #36

You won't be able to show me where in the SCotUS decision it okays inciting violence Bernardo de La Paz Oct 5 #37

I am not overreacting in sense of the word and certainly did not make SCOTUS explicitly my point. Bev54 Oct 5 #39

I can't read your mind to know. I can only read what you actually post Bernardo de La Paz Oct 5 #41

Can't read my mind but willing to misinterpret my comments and then insist to me Bev54 Oct 5 #42

I read what you wrote. If you are the first to highlight SCotUS, then it is your point Bernardo de La Paz Oct 5 #44

Go bother someone else, I have zero interest in your opinion of my comment, nor your judgement. Bev54 Oct 5 #45

To avoid comment and replies, don't post publicly. . . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Oct 5 #46

You two need to get a room.... AZ8theist Oct 5 #49

The overlying problem has existed for years. The problem is local bodys (local governments) CAN NOT stop or control..... usaf-vet Oct 5 #13

Details too complicated for my simple mind bucolic_frolic Oct 5 #21

To complicated WAS exactly what I wanted to point out. Individuals CAN'T fix this level of complexity. Only goverments! usaf-vet Oct 5 #29

The interwebs have always been lawless. Regulations have always been patchwork. jaxexpat Oct 5 #30

I only know of one politician with the foresight to anticipate this phenomenon.... my one guy would be Paul Wellstone. usaf-vet Oct 5 #33

Thanks for the reminder. I'd forgotten. The PTB had their way with him for that. jaxexpat Oct 5 #34

jaxexpat............ Upthevibe Oct 5 #40

The 2000 election was a revelation of western civilization's fragility and ultimate collapse. jaxexpat Oct 5 #48

Because of course. The man-babies are mad that someone who flagrantly Scrivener7 Oct 5 #2

The flying MAGA monkeys are always ready.Bidenomics must've given them a lot of disposable income to play with Walleye Oct 5 #3

Yep. Exactly. paleotn Oct 5 #17

If you threaten a judge you must be tracked down and charged bottomofthehill Oct 5 #7

Trump has given folks the greenlight to bully Sugarmaggie Oct 5 #8

Spot on Evolve Dammit Oct 5 #53

When will law enforcement The Wizard Oct 5 #9

This is why doxxing is never okay. LisaM Oct 5 #11

Comes with the territory Mysterian Oct 5 #15

Prosecuting the threat mongers? Wapo did a story on just this topic the other day... paleotn Oct 5 #16

"as a practical matter, our government may need to step outside the letter of law" BumRushDaShow Oct 5 #22

I know. Trust me, I get it. It's dangerous but..... paleotn Oct 5 #26

Don't forget that a dozen Constitutional Amendments BumRushDaShow Oct 5 #31

Tina Peters would make a perfect Sovereign Citizen mdbl Oct 5 #18

Hope she isn't vain DENVERPOPS Oct 5 #54

I'd be more surprised if there WEREN'T threats from the MAGA terrorists LymphocyteLover Oct 5 #19

This message was self-deleted by its author Chin music Oct 5 #23

Least surprising news of the day, unfortunately. (nt) Paladin Oct 5 #24

Every time I read something like this KS Toronado Oct 5 #25

I'm not worried that there will be a bloodbath. They don't have enough loonies with guns to take over. flying_wahini Oct 5 #28

That's what I see, some outbreaks here and there KS Toronado Oct 5 #52

Sorry, but I disagree DENVERPOPS Oct 5 #55

You make some real valid points POPS KS Toronado Oct 5 #56

I sure hope DENVERPOPS Oct 5 #57

It is Double OO magnums KS Toronado Oct 5 #58

Oh Wow DENVERPOPS Oct 6 #60

Law enforcement needs to start dragging these people in Old Crank Oct 5 #32

BumRushDaShow....... Upthevibe Oct 5 #38

These creepoids are coming out of the woodwork DENVERPOPS Oct 6 #61

They just refuse to accept the TRUTH. She had a trial and was found GUILTY. She/other MAGATs are not above the law. iluvtennis Oct 5 #43

I listened to his full 15 minute sentencing speech. LuckyLib Oct 5 #50

Ivan Raiklin Rewarded by the Leo/Koch Donor Machine RTT Oct 5 #51

and that illustrates perfectly why she needed the long sentence she got prodigitalson Oct 5 #59