Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: 'Washingon Post' won't endorse in White House race for first time since 1980s [View all]spooky3
(36,419 posts)15. Bezos bought them long ago and largely has stayed out
of operations. This is the first year for this weak, cowardly, and unprincipled decision. However, he surely had a hand in selecting top management and they have trended red.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
2 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
104 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
'Washingon Post' won't endorse in White House race for first time since 1980s [View all]
demmiblue
Oct 25
OP
or maybe is trying to get off his "enemy within" list and whatever may follow (n/t)
thesquanderer
Oct 25
#60
I grew up in a WaPo home and have had my own subscription since 1982. I just canceled it.
50 Shades Of Blue
Oct 25
#8
I've been looking at the comments section on the announcement. MANY cancellations!
50 Shades Of Blue
Oct 25
#49
Exactly. WaPo's (Bezos') move to step in and block the draft Harris endorsement was simply reprehensible. nt
SunSeeker
Oct 25
#78
This is not an election. It's a choice between democracy and fascism, life and death for countless people.
usonian
Oct 25
#29
Recognize that this isn't an isolated incident. The same people, same judgement
RockRaven
Oct 25
#35
You're right..but it's the principle. And one has to ask themselves...what's next? Gonna be okay with a fascist prez?
PortTack
Oct 25
#41
It's not about changing minds. There are undecided voters whose minds aren't made up.
pnwmom
Oct 25
#55
TFG can use this as he used the same LA Times decision, as "proof" that even the left doesn't think much of Kamala (nt)
thesquanderer
Oct 25
#59
"The reason he cited was to create "independent space" where the newspaper does not tell people for whom to vote"
Ray Bruns
Oct 25
#48
Like with the LA Times, the WaPo editorial board had drafted a Harris endorsement.
SunSeeker
Oct 25
#74
Yet another "logical" conclusion to Reagan policy. Ending the Fairness Doctrine lead to this.
mjvpi
Oct 25
#61
I am disappointed in the Post. I will continue to subscribe because their reporting, particularly deep investigations
Martin68
Oct 25
#68
No thank you, the post is one of the best sources of international, national and local news (I live in Virginia).
Martin68
Oct 25
#81
Like with the LA Times, the WaPo editorial board had drafted a Harris endorsement.
SunSeeker
Oct 25
#77
A member of the Wash Post editorial department tells me: Bezos's decision not to endorse is "an outrageous abdication of
demmiblue
Oct 25
#72
Scoop: Washington Post editor at large Robert Kagan confirms to me that he resigned from the Post following today's...
demmiblue
Oct 25
#73
Like with the LA Times, the WaPo editorial board had drafted a Harris endorsement.
SunSeeker
Oct 25
#75
A statement from Post Guild leadership on the Washington Post's decision to not endorse a presidential candidate
demmiblue
Oct 25
#79
Mini update: The furor at the WaPo is such that its chief tech officer is getting engineers to block Qs about its...
demmiblue
Oct 25
#88
Apparently Amazon prefers unfettered chokepoint capitalism to any semblance of democracy
Doctoris Extincti
Oct 25
#96
So in a contest between American democracy and movement toward total fascism, WaPo stays in the darkness?
Taraman
Oct 25
#102
Bob Woodward and Carl Bernstein used the word "disappointed" for this faux-pas.
C0RI0LANUS
Oct 27
#104