Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: 'Washingon Post' won't endorse in White House race for first time since 1980s [View all]C0RI0LANUS
(1,868 posts)89. What would these two say?
Bod Woodward and Carl Bernstein at the Washington Post investigating the Watergate Scandal which toppled Republican POTUS Richard M. Nixon.
(Photo: Circa 1973)
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
104 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
'Washingon Post' won't endorse in White House race for first time since 1980s [View all]
demmiblue
Oct 25
OP
or maybe is trying to get off his "enemy within" list and whatever may follow (n/t)
thesquanderer
Oct 25
#60
I grew up in a WaPo home and have had my own subscription since 1982. I just canceled it.
50 Shades Of Blue
Oct 25
#8
I've been looking at the comments section on the announcement. MANY cancellations!
50 Shades Of Blue
Oct 25
#49
Exactly. WaPo's (Bezos') move to step in and block the draft Harris endorsement was simply reprehensible. nt
SunSeeker
Oct 25
#78
This is not an election. It's a choice between democracy and fascism, life and death for countless people.
usonian
Oct 25
#29
Recognize that this isn't an isolated incident. The same people, same judgement
RockRaven
Oct 25
#35
You're right..but it's the principle. And one has to ask themselves...what's next? Gonna be okay with a fascist prez?
PortTack
Oct 25
#41
It's not about changing minds. There are undecided voters whose minds aren't made up.
pnwmom
Oct 25
#55
TFG can use this as he used the same LA Times decision, as "proof" that even the left doesn't think much of Kamala (nt)
thesquanderer
Oct 25
#59
"The reason he cited was to create "independent space" where the newspaper does not tell people for whom to vote"
Ray Bruns
Oct 25
#48
Like with the LA Times, the WaPo editorial board had drafted a Harris endorsement.
SunSeeker
Oct 25
#74
Yet another "logical" conclusion to Reagan policy. Ending the Fairness Doctrine lead to this.
mjvpi
Oct 25
#61
I am disappointed in the Post. I will continue to subscribe because their reporting, particularly deep investigations
Martin68
Oct 25
#68
No thank you, the post is one of the best sources of international, national and local news (I live in Virginia).
Martin68
Oct 25
#81
Like with the LA Times, the WaPo editorial board had drafted a Harris endorsement.
SunSeeker
Oct 25
#77
A member of the Wash Post editorial department tells me: Bezos's decision not to endorse is "an outrageous abdication of
demmiblue
Oct 25
#72
Scoop: Washington Post editor at large Robert Kagan confirms to me that he resigned from the Post following today's...
demmiblue
Oct 25
#73
Like with the LA Times, the WaPo editorial board had drafted a Harris endorsement.
SunSeeker
Oct 25
#75
A statement from Post Guild leadership on the Washington Post's decision to not endorse a presidential candidate
demmiblue
Oct 25
#79
Mini update: The furor at the WaPo is such that its chief tech officer is getting engineers to block Qs about its...
demmiblue
Oct 25
#88
Apparently Amazon prefers unfettered chokepoint capitalism to any semblance of democracy
Doctoris Extincti
Oct 25
#96
So in a contest between American democracy and movement toward total fascism, WaPo stays in the darkness?
Taraman
Oct 25
#102
Bob Woodward and Carl Bernstein used the word "disappointed" for this faux-pas.
C0RI0LANUS
Oct 27
#104