Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Sexual orientation, gender ID on track to be on US Census Bureau survey by 2027 [View all]niyad
(120,673 posts)19. Years ago, in an online "over 40's group" to which I belonged, newcomers
were generally asked a/s/l , standing for age, sex, and location, as a casual, non-required introduction. Many of us, being smartasses, had various smartass answers, such as: a- older than god, s- not nearly enough, and l-- wherever I want to be.
I am guessing that such answers will not be an option?
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
2 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
44 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Sexual orientation, gender ID on track to be on US Census Bureau survey by 2027 [View all]
BumRushDaShow
Nov 7
OP
How will they handle "refusals"... Some may prefer not to answer such invasive questions.
hlthe2b
Nov 7
#1
Problem with lawsuits to protect our rights is the courts now and they will only get worse soon.
Attilatheblond
Nov 8
#44
yeah... Thus my question earlier as to whether or not they have a "refuse to answer" option.
hlthe2b
Nov 7
#6
Yep - I have started to remove anything that identifies my orientation from online
FreeState
Nov 7
#9
For a very, very long time I have answered female. I have 2 daughters and 4 gchildren. It is
efhmc
Nov 7
#15
Why would I tell a government agency something that I wouldn't tell any other stranger?
LudwigPastorius
Nov 7
#17
I think the intent was to be "inclusive" in the Census because it DOES track gender
BumRushDaShow
Nov 7
#20