Hillary Clinton Slams Methodist Church for Boycott Israel Push

[Little Tich]

11. I think that some pressure would be needed to convince Israel to give up all lands occupied since

1967 as decided in several UN resolutions.

Anything less would make a Palestinian state non-viable, and there's no point in creating a state that won't be able to function as one.

While I believe that it's morally wrong to remove people of one ethnicity to make place for another, a two-state solution is not possible if the 600 000 settlers should stay. It's a bit of a dilemma - either the settlements or the two-state solution but not both. I can't see HRC criticizing or pressuring Israel in any way that would force Israel to change the current status quo, which will lead to a one-state solution by default.

If 600 000 settlers would have to move to Israel to make the two-state solution possible, do you think it would be worth it, and should Israel be pressured into making them move? Or am I just framing the whole issue wrong?