Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Frank_Norris_Lives

(114 posts)
3. What...
Mon Jul 22, 2013, 02:02 AM
Jul 2013

....bullshit. Read the original study, it says no such thing:

http://www.frontiersin.org/Personality_Science_and_Individual_Differences/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00409/full

It does say however:

"Conventionalist comments (M = 2.08, SD = 1.02) were significantly more hostile than conspiracist comments (M = 1.44, SD = 0.79), t(2172) = 16.22, p < 0.001 (see Table 1). "

Figures. Lash out in helplessness and denial.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

"...we cannot say with certainty that conventionalist comments are more hostile on average... Make7 Jul 2013 #1
from the same article zappaman Jul 2013 #2
What... Frank_Norris_Lives Jul 2013 #3
I was referencing the article linked in the OP. zappaman Jul 2013 #4
???? Frank_Norris_Lives Jul 2013 #5
k here... wildbilln864 Jul 2013 #7
Here ya go William Seger Aug 2013 #8
We can clearly see it here on DU. ocpagu Jul 2013 #6
What we can clearly see here on DU William Seger Aug 2013 #9
I imagine the corollary is also true LanternWaste Sep 2013 #10
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Creative Speculation»New studies: ‘Conspiracy ...»Reply #3