Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

superbeachnut

(381 posts)
6. 911 truth fantasy backed by pilot for truth lies about RADAR, big FAIL
Tue Jul 1, 2014, 12:31 PM
Jul 2014

Last edited Tue Jul 1, 2014, 01:23 PM - Edit history (1)

RADAR proves it was stock 767.
Pilots for truth make up dumbed down lies of aircraft swaps, and nonsense. Yet, the pilots for truth failed to write up RADAR as being bogus, and in fact, the fantasy believing pilots at pilots for truth use RADAR to maintain safety and track their flights everyday, and pilots like Jeff Latas who lies about 911, still use RADAR, proving RADAR is valid. RADAR proves pilot for truth videos are fiction, used to mislead people.

https://www.ntsb.gov/doclib/foia/9_11/Flight_Path_Study_UA175.pdf
RADAR wins again, proof flight 175 was a stock 767. The FBI knows, why can't pilots for truth tell the truth? Ironic name for a mess of lies, fantasy, and nonsense.
Unable to debunk RADAR, pilots for truth stuck with fake Vg diagrams, lies of plane swaps, impossible speed lies, and more "offer no theory" claims based on ignorance as best.

Pilots for truth lie about 911.
They can't do math, so they lie. So supporting the fantasy pod nonsense is what pilots for truth do. No evidence, just talk.
http://www.cesura17.net/~will/Ephemera/Sept11/Balsamo/balsamo2.html
no math, just woo --- how do you mess up math that bad? Guess supporting the pod fantasy fits with the fantasy physics.


Where is pilots for truth's Pulitzer? Wait, this is the Creative Speculation. Spreading lies about 911 is not very creative.

Yes, they ALL look like that William Seger Jun 2014 #1
no Billy nationalize the fed Jul 2014 #4
911 truth fantasy makes no sense, based on ignorance superbeachnut Jul 2014 #5
The bulge is not symmetrical as you can see here nationalize the fed Jul 2014 #8
Jesus Christ, do you truthers find a conspiracy in every thing? IronGate Jul 2014 #9
I asked a simple question, Einstein nationalize the fed Jul 2014 #10
oops, RADAR debunks this claptrap superbeachnut Jul 2014 #11
What is that bulge? You didn't even try. nationalize the fed Jul 2014 #12
Flight 175 fantasy pod superbeachnut Jul 2014 #13
"you are spreading dumbed down lies" nationalize the fed Jul 2014 #15
No evidence yet superbeachnut Jul 2014 #33
that's a moving object poorly lighted with a slow virtual shutter speed jberryhill Jul 2014 #23
did you just make this uo? jberryhill Jul 2014 #22
Do you intend to respond to any of the substantive replies to that question? jberryhill Jul 2014 #32
Even here in creative speculation we still have Politicalboi Jul 2014 #21
Yes, because accepting hard evidence and science is idiotic. AZCat Jul 2014 #30
There is nothing fragile about the wingbox of an airliner hack89 Jul 2014 #31
Google "motion blur" (n/t) William Seger Jul 2014 #7
RADAR proves it was Flight 175, a stock 767 superbeachnut Jun 2014 #2
Radar proves no such thing... johndoeX Jun 2014 #3
Bob McIlvaine delphi72 Jul 2014 #17
McIlvaine is PfT Fodder delphi72 Jul 2014 #24
Post removed Post removed May 2016 #34
911 truth fantasy backed by pilot for truth lies about RADAR, big FAIL superbeachnut Jul 2014 #6
Further analysis and pictures of Air Force Aircraft with cylinders attached to fuselage nationalize the fed Jul 2014 #14
debunked by RADAR again, not matter what lies 911 truth makes up, NO Pod superbeachnut Jul 2014 #16
What do you think is the significance of the bulge? hack89 Jul 2014 #18
Because delphi72 Jul 2014 #19
Where is the Pulitzer Prize superbeachnut Jul 2014 #20
what if archaic56 Jul 2014 #25
What if zappaman Jul 2014 #28
OMG, I've found another one! cpwm17 Jul 2014 #26
They've seeded the internets with altered pictures of airplanes jberryhill Jul 2014 #27
And they would have gotten away with it... zappaman Jul 2014 #29
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Creative Speculation»Anyone ever see a Boeing ...»Reply #6