Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

superbeachnut

(381 posts)
13. Flight 175 fantasy pod
Wed Jul 2, 2014, 12:34 AM
Jul 2014

I flew Boeing jets, you see a 767, and you are fooled by shadow and light.

The 767 that hit the WTC was a stock 767, it was tracked from takeoff to impact by RADAR. A ground controller cleared Fight 175 to taxi out. The airline has the names of each person on board, this is why we know the terrorists by name, and how we eliminated each passenger as a suspect; BINGO

The flight manifest ls on record, the taxi out, on record, the RADAR, on record. What you see are where the landing gear is.

I don't have to try, I flew heavy jets, I am take photos and understand light and shadow. You googled this up and use a low resolution video to make up lies.

911 truth lies about 911 are not censored, they are all over the Internet. The fact is, 911 truth can't connect the dots, they don't use evidence, they make up BS.

You believe in lies, we are not burning books, you are spreading dumbed down lies. And you are not censored, you are not stopped from spreading lies about 911. You offer no evidence for your claim, ignore RADAR. When you leave, don't fly, you don't respect RADAR, and RADAR is used to keep you safe; you deny RADAR, science, you don't use evidence, you make up fantasy - or did you google this one.

It is a 767, a stock 767-200. Did you call the victims families, or are you going to keep this Pulitzer Prize winning news to yourself. What did CBS, NBC, ABC, CNN, say. When will you take action. Bet you will not leave the USA, it sounds like your claim it is not a 767, not the truth. Remember, you deny RADAR proves it is Flight 175, better stop flying, RADAR is what we use for safe separation. Good luck with the move, but try to get some knowledge on light and shadow, and aircraft recognition.

Is this the Creative Speculation place, thus is your claim just joke, a fantasy, or do you think it is breaking news, the real thing? This was debunked long ago.

https://www.ntsb.gov/doclib/foia/9_11/Flight_Path_Study_UA175.pdf
Don't you do RADAR? Do you understand you can get the raw data for all the flights on 911? You can prove to yourself it was 175 - but you don't want to ruin your fantasy? Why not check the data, do you need help with the math? What happen to the Passengers in your fantasy of 911? What was the "pod" which is where the landing gear is. Was the landing gear some kind of secret transformer thing.

You can't explain your fantasy? What was the pod? It is light and shadow, but go ahead, explain your story in full. Was it Flight 175? Where are the Passengers? Etc. You understand as a pilot, the person who signs for the aircraft, I inspect the aircraft, if there is a pod on my aircraft, I don't fly it. it is a fact, we don't fly modified aircraft - your pod fails for Flight 175, it can't happen. Are you an aircraft swap person, thus we have thousands of people extra on the plot instead of 19 terrorists who really did 911.

What is your fantasy, spell it out, explain all the details of your "Creative Speculation" theory on Flight 175.

What would the pod be? The aircraft speed and mass gave 175 a kinetic energy imapct equal in energy to 2093 pounds of TNT, a 2,000 pound bomb. What would the pod do?

Yes, they ALL look like that William Seger Jun 2014 #1
no Billy nationalize the fed Jul 2014 #4
911 truth fantasy makes no sense, based on ignorance superbeachnut Jul 2014 #5
The bulge is not symmetrical as you can see here nationalize the fed Jul 2014 #8
Jesus Christ, do you truthers find a conspiracy in every thing? IronGate Jul 2014 #9
I asked a simple question, Einstein nationalize the fed Jul 2014 #10
oops, RADAR debunks this claptrap superbeachnut Jul 2014 #11
What is that bulge? You didn't even try. nationalize the fed Jul 2014 #12
Flight 175 fantasy pod superbeachnut Jul 2014 #13
"you are spreading dumbed down lies" nationalize the fed Jul 2014 #15
No evidence yet superbeachnut Jul 2014 #33
that's a moving object poorly lighted with a slow virtual shutter speed jberryhill Jul 2014 #23
did you just make this uo? jberryhill Jul 2014 #22
Do you intend to respond to any of the substantive replies to that question? jberryhill Jul 2014 #32
Even here in creative speculation we still have Politicalboi Jul 2014 #21
Yes, because accepting hard evidence and science is idiotic. AZCat Jul 2014 #30
There is nothing fragile about the wingbox of an airliner hack89 Jul 2014 #31
Google "motion blur" (n/t) William Seger Jul 2014 #7
RADAR proves it was Flight 175, a stock 767 superbeachnut Jun 2014 #2
Radar proves no such thing... johndoeX Jun 2014 #3
Bob McIlvaine delphi72 Jul 2014 #17
McIlvaine is PfT Fodder delphi72 Jul 2014 #24
Post removed Post removed May 2016 #34
911 truth fantasy backed by pilot for truth lies about RADAR, big FAIL superbeachnut Jul 2014 #6
Further analysis and pictures of Air Force Aircraft with cylinders attached to fuselage nationalize the fed Jul 2014 #14
debunked by RADAR again, not matter what lies 911 truth makes up, NO Pod superbeachnut Jul 2014 #16
What do you think is the significance of the bulge? hack89 Jul 2014 #18
Because delphi72 Jul 2014 #19
Where is the Pulitzer Prize superbeachnut Jul 2014 #20
what if archaic56 Jul 2014 #25
What if zappaman Jul 2014 #28
OMG, I've found another one! cpwm17 Jul 2014 #26
They've seeded the internets with altered pictures of airplanes jberryhill Jul 2014 #27
And they would have gotten away with it... zappaman Jul 2014 #29
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Creative Speculation»Anyone ever see a Boeing ...»Reply #13