Creative Speculation
In reply to the discussion: Anyone ever see a Boeing 767 that looks like this? [View all]superbeachnut
(381 posts)I flew Boeing jets, you see a 767, and you are fooled by shadow and light.
The 767 that hit the WTC was a stock 767, it was tracked from takeoff to impact by RADAR. A ground controller cleared Fight 175 to taxi out. The airline has the names of each person on board, this is why we know the terrorists by name, and how we eliminated each passenger as a suspect; BINGO
The flight manifest ls on record, the taxi out, on record, the RADAR, on record. What you see are where the landing gear is.
I don't have to try, I flew heavy jets, I am take photos and understand light and shadow. You googled this up and use a low resolution video to make up lies.
911 truth lies about 911 are not censored, they are all over the Internet. The fact is, 911 truth can't connect the dots, they don't use evidence, they make up BS.
You believe in lies, we are not burning books, you are spreading dumbed down lies. And you are not censored, you are not stopped from spreading lies about 911. You offer no evidence for your claim, ignore RADAR. When you leave, don't fly, you don't respect RADAR, and RADAR is used to keep you safe; you deny RADAR, science, you don't use evidence, you make up fantasy - or did you google this one.
It is a 767, a stock 767-200. Did you call the victims families, or are you going to keep this Pulitzer Prize winning news to yourself. What did CBS, NBC, ABC, CNN, say. When will you take action. Bet you will not leave the USA, it sounds like your claim it is not a 767, not the truth. Remember, you deny RADAR proves it is Flight 175, better stop flying, RADAR is what we use for safe separation. Good luck with the move, but try to get some knowledge on light and shadow, and aircraft recognition.
Is this the Creative Speculation place, thus is your claim just joke, a fantasy, or do you think it is breaking news, the real thing? This was debunked long ago.
https://www.ntsb.gov/doclib/foia/9_11/Flight_Path_Study_UA175.pdf
Don't you do RADAR? Do you understand you can get the raw data for all the flights on 911? You can prove to yourself it was 175 - but you don't want to ruin your fantasy? Why not check the data, do you need help with the math? What happen to the Passengers in your fantasy of 911? What was the "pod" which is where the landing gear is. Was the landing gear some kind of secret transformer thing.
You can't explain your fantasy? What was the pod? It is light and shadow, but go ahead, explain your story in full. Was it Flight 175? Where are the Passengers? Etc. You understand as a pilot, the person who signs for the aircraft, I inspect the aircraft, if there is a pod on my aircraft, I don't fly it. it is a fact, we don't fly modified aircraft - your pod fails for Flight 175, it can't happen. Are you an aircraft swap person, thus we have thousands of people extra on the plot instead of 19 terrorists who really did 911.
What is your fantasy, spell it out, explain all the details of your "Creative Speculation" theory on Flight 175.
What would the pod be? The aircraft speed and mass gave 175 a kinetic energy imapct equal in energy to 2093 pounds of TNT, a 2,000 pound bomb. What would the pod do?