Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

superbeachnut

(381 posts)
12. lol, there goes your inside job, this post means you are faking the 911 truth junk,
Thu Aug 14, 2014, 11:02 AM
Aug 2014

Bush got 911 right, nuts who worked with UBL did 911. You have had 13 years, and you can't come up with anything rational on 911. Irony, Bush got 911 right, you got 911 mixed up with some fantasy world of BS.

As for Iraq, it has nothing to do with 911, but 911 truth followers get confused.

lol, there goes your inside job, this post means you are faking the 911 truth junk,

gyroscope - Chimpy got 9/11 right? You mean like he got Iraq right?
Hey where them WMDs at? In your dreams?

If he got it right he would have stopped 9/11 from happening in the first place.
The criminal Boosh admin. are the last people on earth I would trust to ever investigate anything.

The FBI investigated 911, you must of missed it. They are not the Bush Administration, they are people who work for the FBI.
How can he stop your fantasy? What happened on 911 that bush could stop since your 911 never existed.
You believe in remote control, how can Bush stop that, it is in your fantasy.
You believe in CD, how can he stop something that never happened.

How do you stop people from rushing the cockpit and cutting the pilots throats? Explain how you read the minds of 19 murderers before they do it?

We know if you were president it would have happened because you can't figure out 911 after it happened.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Simple ChazInAz Aug 2014 #1
Correlation does not imply causation gyroscope Aug 2014 #2
911 truth has no simple plot, their claims requires thousands in on the plot superbeachnut Aug 2014 #7
Creative speculation ... Trajan Aug 2014 #26
The only people embarrassing themselves nationalize the fed Aug 2014 #3
2 planes, 3 buildings came down. dixiegrrrrl Aug 2014 #4
The president said, "saw (where) the first plane hit". lol, it means he left out "where" superbeachnut Aug 2014 #6
Plenty of people saw the first plane hit. zappaman Aug 2014 #8
9/11 was domestic terrorism gyroscope Aug 2014 #9
Someone missed the biggest investigation in history - started on 911 by the FBI - another lie superbeachnut Aug 2014 #10
Are you joking? gyroscope Aug 2014 #11
lol, there goes your inside job, this post means you are faking the 911 truth junk, superbeachnut Aug 2014 #12
Those damned unicorns! Iggo Aug 2014 #29
No explosives were used, why would you have to check? There was no boom from explosives superbeachnut Aug 2014 #5
"Which begs the question why didn't they test for explosives??" William Seger Aug 2014 #13
They were aware alright gyroscope Aug 2014 #14
Aware of what? Magic explosives? William Seger Aug 2014 #15
Invisible magic fire? gyroscope Aug 2014 #16
So you don't have an answer? William Seger Aug 2014 #17
Post removed Post removed Aug 2014 #18
Ah, I see. William Seger Aug 2014 #19
Why didn't Truthers test for explosive residue? hack89 Aug 2014 #20
They did BobbyBoring Aug 2014 #24
They found paint chips hack89 Aug 2014 #25
lol, thermite an insane claim made up by a 911 truth nut superbeachnut Aug 2014 #30
And.. WovenGems Aug 2014 #21
Fairy dust doesn't exist. Explosives do. There goes your brilliant theory. n/t estevamsp33 Aug 2014 #23
Explosives exist, silent explosives do not. cpwm17 Aug 2014 #27
but they weren't silent! wildbilln864 Aug 2014 #28
No body reported explosives were used superbeachnut Aug 2014 #32
"Which begs the question why didn't they test for explosives?" estevamsp33 Aug 2014 #22
No explosives were used superbeachnut Aug 2014 #31
"No explosives were used" estevamsp33 Aug 2014 #33
No explosives, except in the minds of failed 911 truth followers superbeachnut Aug 2014 #34
Why should they have tested for explosives? AZCat Aug 2014 #35
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Creative Speculation»NIST: "We did not te...»Reply #12