Friendly forums for passionate Dems!
More than 92 million posts since 2001
Home Latest Greatest Videos Forums Hide ads Join up!
Home Latest Greatest
Videos Forums Help
Hide ads Join up!
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Creative Speculation»NIST: "We did not te...»Reply #18
Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Creative Speculation

In reply to the discussion: NIST: "We did not test for explosive residue." [View all]

Response to William Seger (Reply #17)

Post removed

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

35 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
NIST: "We did not test for explosive residue." [View all] gyroscope Aug 2014 OP
Simple ChazInAz Aug 2014 #1
Correlation does not imply causation gyroscope Aug 2014 #2
911 truth has no simple plot, their claims requires thousands in on the plot superbeachnut Aug 2014 #7
Creative speculation ... Trajan Aug 2014 #26
The only people embarrassing themselves nationalize the fed Aug 2014 #3
2 planes, 3 buildings came down. dixiegrrrrl Aug 2014 #4
The president said, "saw (where) the first plane hit". lol, it means he left out "where" superbeachnut Aug 2014 #6
Plenty of people saw the first plane hit. zappaman Aug 2014 #8
9/11 was domestic terrorism gyroscope Aug 2014 #9
Someone missed the biggest investigation in history - started on 911 by the FBI - another lie superbeachnut Aug 2014 #10
Are you joking? gyroscope Aug 2014 #11
lol, there goes your inside job, this post means you are faking the 911 truth junk, superbeachnut Aug 2014 #12
Those damned unicorns! Iggo Aug 2014 #29
No explosives were used, why would you have to check? There was no boom from explosives superbeachnut Aug 2014 #5
"Which begs the question why didn't they test for explosives??" William Seger Aug 2014 #13
They were aware alright gyroscope Aug 2014 #14
Aware of what? Magic explosives? William Seger Aug 2014 #15
Invisible magic fire? gyroscope Aug 2014 #16
So you don't have an answer? William Seger Aug 2014 #17
Post removed Post removed Aug 2014 #18
Ah, I see. William Seger Aug 2014 #19
Why didn't Truthers test for explosive residue? hack89 Aug 2014 #20
They did BobbyBoring Aug 2014 #24
They found paint chips hack89 Aug 2014 #25
lol, thermite an insane claim made up by a 911 truth nut superbeachnut Aug 2014 #30
And.. WovenGems Aug 2014 #21
Fairy dust doesn't exist. Explosives do. There goes your brilliant theory. n/t estevamsp33 Aug 2014 #23
Explosives exist, silent explosives do not. cpwm17 Aug 2014 #27
but they weren't silent! wildbilln864 Aug 2014 #28
No body reported explosives were used superbeachnut Aug 2014 #32
"Which begs the question why didn't they test for explosives?" estevamsp33 Aug 2014 #22
No explosives were used superbeachnut Aug 2014 #31
"No explosives were used" estevamsp33 Aug 2014 #33
No explosives, except in the minds of failed 911 truth followers superbeachnut Aug 2014 #34
Why should they have tested for explosives? AZCat Aug 2014 #35
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Creative Speculation»NIST: "We did not te...»Reply #18
Home | Latest Discussions | Greatest Discussions | Latest Videos | All Forums

About | Copyright | Privacy | Terms of service | Contact

In Memoriam

© 2001 - 2024 Democratic Underground, LLC. Thank you for visiting.