Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Creative Speculation

hack89

(39,180 posts)

20. Why didn't Truthers test for explosive residue?

Reply to gyroscope (Original post)

Thu Aug 14, 2014, 05:08 PM

Aug 2014

we keep hearing about all these engineers and Phd's - how come none of them were smart enough to go to a rooftop near the WTC site and scoop up a bunch of dust samples?

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

35 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

NIST: "We did not test for explosive residue." [View all] gyroscope Aug 2014 OP

Simple ChazInAz Aug 2014 #1

Correlation does not imply causation gyroscope Aug 2014 #2

911 truth has no simple plot, their claims requires thousands in on the plot superbeachnut Aug 2014 #7

Creative speculation ... Trajan Aug 2014 #26

The only people embarrassing themselves nationalize the fed Aug 2014 #3

2 planes, 3 buildings came down. dixiegrrrrl Aug 2014 #4

The president said, "saw (where) the first plane hit". lol, it means he left out "where" superbeachnut Aug 2014 #6

Plenty of people saw the first plane hit. zappaman Aug 2014 #8

9/11 was domestic terrorism gyroscope Aug 2014 #9

Someone missed the biggest investigation in history - started on 911 by the FBI - another lie superbeachnut Aug 2014 #10

Are you joking? gyroscope Aug 2014 #11

lol, there goes your inside job, this post means you are faking the 911 truth junk, superbeachnut Aug 2014 #12

Those damned unicorns! Iggo Aug 2014 #29

No explosives were used, why would you have to check? There was no boom from explosives superbeachnut Aug 2014 #5

"Which begs the question why didn't they test for explosives??" William Seger Aug 2014 #13

They were aware alright gyroscope Aug 2014 #14

Aware of what? Magic explosives? William Seger Aug 2014 #15

Invisible magic fire? gyroscope Aug 2014 #16

So you don't have an answer? William Seger Aug 2014 #17

Post removed Post removed Aug 2014 #18

Ah, I see. William Seger Aug 2014 #19

Why didn't Truthers test for explosive residue? hack89 Aug 2014 #20

They did BobbyBoring Aug 2014 #24

They found paint chips hack89 Aug 2014 #25

lol, thermite an insane claim made up by a 911 truth nut superbeachnut Aug 2014 #30

And.. WovenGems Aug 2014 #21

Fairy dust doesn't exist. Explosives do. There goes your brilliant theory. n/t estevamsp33 Aug 2014 #23

Explosives exist, silent explosives do not. cpwm17 Aug 2014 #27

but they weren't silent! wildbilln864 Aug 2014 #28

No body reported explosives were used superbeachnut Aug 2014 #32

"Which begs the question why didn't they test for explosives?" estevamsp33 Aug 2014 #22

No explosives were used superbeachnut Aug 2014 #31

"No explosives were used" estevamsp33 Aug 2014 #33

No explosives, except in the minds of failed 911 truth followers superbeachnut Aug 2014 #34

Why should they have tested for explosives? AZCat Aug 2014 #35