2016 Postmortem

ElementaryPenguin

(7,847 posts)

67. The mere fact that one is SLOW to connect the dots -

Reply to dionysus (Reply #42)

Fri Jan 20, 2017, 09:47 AM

Jan 2017

DOES NOT DISPROVE ANYTHING!! (Nor does a lack of appreciation for unorthodox punctuation!.!.!.!.!.!)

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

69 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

They did DOWN BALLOT shit too...and YES I mean voting machines [View all] LaydeeBug Jan 2017 OP

ALCOA! Dr Hobbitstein Jan 2017 #1

Head in the sand much? LaydeeBug Jan 2017 #2

Not at all, I just tend not to jump to conclusions Dr Hobbitstein Jan 2017 #20

Oh, you are certainly jumping to conclusions... LaydeeBug Jan 2017 #27

PWD? nt Dr Hobbitstein Jan 2017 #29

Another kick?? Why THANKS AGAIN! LaydeeBug Jan 2017 #40

The projection is astounding, isn't it? dionysus Jan 2017 #43

It *absolutely* IS LaydeeBug Jan 2017 #44

Where's reel 2? dionysus Jan 2017 #47

with the infallable never can be hacked voting machines, bless your heart LaydeeBug Jan 2017 #56

Indeed. Where have I seen projection like that before? nt Dr Hobbitstein Jan 2017 #53

Where indeed LaydeeBug Jan 2017 #55

I am open to this possibility, but the problem is there's no hard evidence for this Fast Walker 52 Jan 2017 #3

They cheat and will always cheat. We outnumber them so that's the only way they can "win" brush Jan 2017 #4

I know, and they control the fucking media too Fast Walker 52 Jan 2017 #5

And that, in a nutshell is how they won. Dr Hobbitstein Jan 2017 #7

I think our number 1 goal has to be to get control of the media Fast Walker 52 Jan 2017 #14

Indeed. Dr Hobbitstein Jan 2017 #16

yeah... that takes real money and patience Fast Walker 52 Jan 2017 #19

prove it. LaydeeBug Jan 2017 #41

Prove it? melman Jan 2017 #49

Just dishing what I'm served. LaydeeBug Jan 2017 #54

Oh, don't get me wrong, I don't think they JUST tampered with machines... LaydeeBug Jan 2017 #9

It's actually the same as the Trump strategy forjusticethunders Jan 2017 #25

Yep. And pretending one thing is 'off the table' or 'impossible' is head in the sand folly. nt LaydeeBug Jan 2017 #28

I'm not 100% there was direct hacking of machines forjusticethunders Jan 2017 #35

Honestly, that's where I am, but because I have worked a LOT of elections LaydeeBug Jan 2017 #59

Several math whizzes advised Sec Clinton TheDebbieDee Jan 2017 #10

It was all so dizzying...we weren't expecting espionage. nt LaydeeBug Jan 2017 #12

+1, now I think the Stein recount was a blocking move to keep HRC from doing such after all uponit7771 Jan 2017 #61

The hard evidence is they hacked state and local electoral boards were the machines are set... uponit7771 Jan 2017 #60

and that evidence is where? Fast Walker 52 Jan 2017 #63

That's were the machines are set, they don't have to hack individual machines when they can hack uponit7771 Jan 2017 #66

maybe this is what cummings was talking about. mopinko Jan 2017 #6

That's my point. If you've worked elections before... LaydeeBug Jan 2017 #13

i have worked elections. it would be so fucking easy. mopinko Jan 2017 #15

Yep. And to act like it is out of the question, or that we have to provide THEM LaydeeBug Jan 2017 #30

+1, and all states that enacted VSM to lower counts in "urban" areas... those fuckers uponit7771 Jan 2017 #62

I agree with you. The complacency and the refusal to even consider that our machines had been BlueCaliDem Jan 2017 #8

THANK YOU FOR THIS. LaydeeBug Jan 2017 #11

No need to thank me. I thank YOU. Fighters should be admired, not excoriated. BlueCaliDem Jan 2017 #17

Holy WOW! Just read this. Thank you for you LaydeeBug Jan 2017 #45

THIS 2naSalit Jan 2017 #18

Just mucking with them so they didn't work would be enough. LisaM Jan 2017 #33

+1, exactly... they didn't need a huge operation just a "big enough" operation to hide uponit7771 Jan 2017 #64

This, this, this...why they are so positive nothing happened is astounding. nt LaydeeBug Jan 2017 #69

Never get tired of posting this: triron Jan 2017 #34

If his analysis brings you comfort that our way of voting is pretty much flawless, then I'm happy BlueCaliDem Jan 2017 #39

You're kidding me? triron Jan 2017 #57

So why aren't President Obama, VP Biden, Pelosi, Schumer and other prominent Democrats Lurks Often Jan 2017 #21

That is exactly what I have been wondering since the story of the big russian conspiracy broke m-lekktor Jan 2017 #22

Or this isn't nearly as much there as some would like you to believe Lurks Often Jan 2017 #23

They're all in on it! dionysus Jan 2017 #46

Damn Straight! Lurks Often Jan 2017 #48

Republicans kenfrequed Jan 2017 #24

Nope. I think it was coordinated...and you're right, the GOP pulled this shit in Ohion 2004 LaydeeBug Jan 2017 #31

There is just no evidence for it kenfrequed Jan 2017 #36

As I've said before, SOMETHING happened on election day. hamsterjill Jan 2017 #26

exactly. This. LaydeeBug Jan 2017 #32

It was unspeakable. hamsterjill Jan 2017 #38

Yes, LB!! After all of Putin's efforts - Hillary still led in all the polls on election eve... ElementaryPenguin Jan 2017 #37

No proof, combined with no proper punctuation, does not prove election fraud. dionysus Jan 2017 #42

. justburnitall Jan 2017 #52

Your insistence that there is no proof flies in the face of the news... LaydeeBug Jan 2017 #58

The report says they hacked state and local electoral boards, if that's not "proof" enough then ... uponit7771 Jan 2017 #65

The mere fact that one is SLOW to connect the dots - ElementaryPenguin Jan 2017 #67

Rude. nt JTFrog Jan 2017 #68

Not a doubt in my mind. ucrdem Jan 2017 #50

Got your back jack... K&R fleabiscuit Jan 2017 #51