Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Response to eridani (Original post)

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Love her!!!! Jackilope Apr 2016 #1
No fees! Sounds like more filthy hippies wantin' free stuff! brewens Apr 2016 #2
Indeed. Silly socialist! Silver_Witch Apr 2016 #27
That's a good ruling. One question, how is this not an accomplishment of Obama Admin? Hoyt Apr 2016 #3
Because some people hate Obama IronLionZion Apr 2016 #6
It sounds like an Elizabeth Warren accomplishment and Not an Obama one fasttense Apr 2016 #25
Sounds to me his admin promulgated the rule. But Obama doesn't get much Hoyt Apr 2016 #28
I am glad to give Pres Obama credit when due, but I will also hold his feet to the fire rhett o rick Apr 2016 #29
While you were watching closely, he greatly improved prescription drug coverage under Hoyt Apr 2016 #31
Are you expecting me to give him credit for not cutting SS? How about the drone kills? rhett o rick Apr 2016 #32
He DID put our Social Security Money "on the table". bvar22 Apr 2016 #34
He might have put it on "the table" as a bluff, but there was ultimately no cut. Hoyt Apr 2016 #35
Not THIS time, bvar22 Apr 2016 #36
I wish this had come years before, but glad it has happened! Dustlawyer Apr 2016 #4
Churning is a scourge whether it's done by investment advisers JimDandy Apr 2016 #5
index funds are usually best for ordinary people IronLionZion Apr 2016 #8
I ws lucky enough to know about Vanguard dixiegrrrrl Apr 2016 #9
Incrementalism is not always bad as long as you are moving in the right direction..you eventually Jitter65 Apr 2016 #14
Why not an unimportant issue, if this is our approach to solving the big bank issue we as a Skwmom Apr 2016 #19
Related thread Jack Rabbit Apr 2016 #7
The GOP is trying to undo the CFPB that she Ilsa Apr 2016 #10
This is great news for people who can afford to invest. eom zalinda Apr 2016 #11
Throw 'em a bone before we cut Social Security. Enthusiast Apr 2016 #12
And that is all it is, a bone. It does not address the huge problems with Wall Street. Skwmom Apr 2016 #18
It shouldn't be too much to ask that firms look out for the best interests Enthusiast Apr 2016 #21
It sounds like these are being made as regulations davidpdx Apr 2016 #13
She would need to protect her backers AllyCat Apr 2016 #24
KnR nt 99th_Monkey Apr 2016 #15
This message was self-deleted by its author mrr303am Apr 2016 #16
You do realize that this only address ONE problem and hardly reins in Wall Street. Skwmom Apr 2016 #17
we've been conditioned to salivate over bone tosses Skittles Apr 2016 #20
Sounds great, but TrueDemVA Apr 2016 #22
"... the Obama administration is calmly trying to enact lasting progressive change." Scuba Apr 2016 #23
Hooray for Elizabeth Warren! raging moderate Apr 2016 #26
So, I'm not, nor have I ever been middle class. Stryst Apr 2016 #30
A financial transaction tax would be a big help here IMO eridani Apr 2016 #37
This will cut costs for investors houston16revival Apr 2016 #33
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Elizabeth Warren»Elizabeth Warren's Big Wi...»Reply #16