Your response to Whisp was so RUDE. Please explain.

I alerted on it and the jury proved how biased they can be:

Well, looking at your own hidden posts...
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1259&pid=307

REASON FOR ALERT:

This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate. (See <a href="http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=aboutus#communitystandards" target="_blank">Community Standards</a>.)

ALERTER'S COMMENTS:

The OP doesn't have a "history" of hidden posts. Her transparency page is blank. This was overboard snotty and rude. And by an Admin, way over being rude.

You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Sun Mar 10, 2013, 03:10 PM, and the Jury voted 1-5 to LEAVE IT.

Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: No explanation given
Juror #2 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: No explanation given
Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: No explanation given
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: Seriously?
Juror #5 voted to HIDE IT and said: It does seem rather like a call-out. Sorry Skinner, she had a perfect right to ask and not have you use Admin powers to embarrass her.
Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: No explanation given

Thank you very much for participating in our Jury system, and we hope you will be able to participate again in the future.

So you think the jury is always right? Of course you do! Whisp has a blank transparency page! the only people she has taken to task are rape apologists and iverglas (OMG, WE ALL RANTED ABOUT IVERGLAS). So 5 jurors were kissing your ass! I'm walking away shaking my head...